Facebook

Twitter

LinkedIn

 

Berkemer v. McCarty Tag

Custodial Interrogation During Traffic Stops

Custodial Interrogation During Traffic Stops

The question of when custodial interrogation starts during traffic stops has challenged courts for many years. Choosing a definite rule as to when someone is in custody affects the timing of Miranda warnings. If a police officer waits too long to read Miranda warnings during a stop, the driver can challenge admissibility in court of any statements he makes after the stop becomes custodial but before the warnings are read. In one of many attempts to determine when “custodial interrogation” begins, the Supreme Court considered the case of Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984). In the case, a state police...

Continue reading

What Kinds of Roadside Questions Require a Miranda Warning?

What Kinds of Roadside Questions Require a Miranda Warning?

Roadside questions from law enforcement – are they legal if you have not been given a Miranda warning? What kinds of questions can the police ask? Two key Supreme Court opinions in the cases of Berkemer v. McCarty and Pennsylvania v. Muniz address and (mostly) answer these common queries in the context of DUI cases. In Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984), a police officer pulled over a driver whose car was swerving in and out of its traffic lane. After the officer pulled over the driver and noticed his difficulty standing and slurred speech, the officer asked the driver...

Continue reading